Join now - be part of our community!

No Mac Support?!? WOW

Not applicable

No Mac Support?!? WOW

WOW. I'm coming straight from a simple Palm Centro, that had Mac and PC versions of their Sync software.

I was super excited to get this phone yesterday. I got two (one for me, one for my gf). I then only find out AFTER the fact that the software for media transfer and Android update is PC-only. Who the heck only does PC-only these days?

Why should I bother transfering invidiual mp3s into a large, unorganized, messy folder like this is some cheap chinese ipod knockoff/usb flash drive? Also, the in-call volume has got to be a joke.

I've never been so upset with a phone decision before. I know its half my fault for taking advertisement and features at their word and making (modern day) assumptions of compatibility. I hope I'm not the only one here that feels a bit jipped after getting this phone. I opted away from the iPhone due to believing it to be overhyped (price/feature), but i'm willing to take this back for the restocking fee and get the less over-hyped & not as falsely marketed iPhone 4.

I don't plan on buying any other SE products ever in the future.

7 REPLIES 7
Not applicable

just a question, what MAC mean exactly?

Intel machine?

Not applicable

The term MAC is reference to an apple macintosh computer... the most widely used configuration and operating system base of the growing share of the computer user environment... The fact that there is no support for your latest series of "Smart-phones" is a bit of a joke. Not so smart if you ask me...

Not applicable

Since Mac has started using Intel chip in its machines, and a lot before, YOUR "most widely used configuration" is DEAD. May be it was true in the early '90s but not now. Nobody really need a Mac to do his job. It is only a mere and old fashioned status symbol.

Not applicable

problem fixed just so you all know. Replaced with an iPhone and my girl with an HTC Slightly_smiling_Face

Not applicable

drXlabs I don't believe you know what you are talking about. As a programmer and having a BS in CIS, I am by no means a mac-fanatic that touts false truths (as both sides do), but that margin of the market that you call dead, is very alive (especially moreso in the last few years). I use both a PC for development work, and a Mac for film composing, they each have great purposes. The more I've had a mac, the more I've realized that I don't need a PC anymore though (Virtualbox and other VM-style apps run XP/2008/7 perfectly fine on it simultaneously (same can't be said for windows running OSX...).

You say:

"Since Mac has started using Intel chip in its machines, and a lot before, YOUR "most widely used configuration" is DEAD."

Actually, since Apple has began putting Intel chips inside their mobos, which isn't "a lot before", but rather only recent, they've risen even more from, as you put it, the 'DEAD'. Their specs, with all things considered equal to a PC (and unless built by a master builder) usually surpass the performance index of a PC. But there are limitations (gaming being the primary).

Tell the next person picking up a dreamworks or pixar film at a store that the movie was made on a dead configuration and archaic. lol

Not applicable

Just try to take this logical and practically, since each technologies are complementing their performance, then the most practical thing is a PC running a dedicated high end soft but a Mac HW itself is just useless and still alive thanks to Apple marketing where you must pay 75% for the logo and the 25% for techs doing the job.. Sorry but I cannot see this viable under a long term scenario.

slimshaddy
Hero