SAR beetween XZ1 compact and XZ2 c. : 1.36 / 0.77 (Head) - 1.32 / 1.05 (Body). Significant

Mougtt — Wed, 06 Jun 2018 19:37:01 GMT

Hello,

I am hesitating beetween those 2 compacts mobiles phones (at the same price...).

The pros for the XZ2c are mainly larger screen and the cons are less battery life and much worse design than the XZ1c.

Something Sony improves is Specific Absorption Rate (to the benefit of the XZ2c) :

0.77 for head and 1.05 for body (XZ2 compact)

1.36 head and 1.32 body... (XZ1 compact)

So, is this difference significant ??

Re: SAR beetween XZ1 compact and XZ2 c. : 1.36 / 0.77 (Head) - 1.32 / 1.05 (Body). Significant

Damo_ — Wed, 06 Jun 2018 20:10:01 GMT

Well the recognised recommended maximum limit is 2 (w/kg per 10g) so whether the difference is significant is really down to what you as an individual class as significant. Both units are well below the recommended maximum.

topic Re: SAR beetween XZ1 compact and XZ2 c. : 1.36 / 0.77 (Head) - 1.32 / 1.05 (Body). Significant in XZ Series

SAR beetween XZ1 compact and XZ2 c. : 1.36 / 0.77 (Head) - 1.32 / 1.05 (Body). Significant

Re: SAR beetween XZ1 compact and XZ2 c. : 1.36 / 0.77 (Head) - 1.32 / 1.05 (Body). Significant